Bewertung
3,8
Gut · von 5 Sternen
3,8von 5 · Gut
Bewertung
Gut · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
316 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Unternehmen
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Fast Track
I like this AI, and it was different. Highly recommended.
kam
been playing around with a few ai options, this one is easier to tailor with good research pull. fortunately their customer service team is not AI, and were super polite and efficient with dealing with my requests.
Kristen
I really wish I could give this company five stars because the slide images I received were genuinely very good. Unfortunately, the credit and subscription model made the overall experience so frustrating that I struggled with how many stars to give. I first signed up back in March because I needed to create a fairly complex slide for a work presentation. I believe I started with the free version, but my free credits disappeared so quickly that I upgraded to a paid subscription. The plan included 10,000 credits per month, which initially sounded like more than enough. I had never used an AI platform with this type of credit system before, and I quickly learned just how fast those credits could disappear. Even relatively small prompts or requests for changes could use a significant number of credits. That said, the final slide I created was excellent, and at the time I thought this could be a really useful tool for future presentations. After that project, however, I simply didn’t have much need for the service. I kept forgetting to cancel my subscription, but I wasn’t overly concerned because I assumed the 10,000 credits I was paying for each month were accumulating in my account. I figured that by the time I needed the service again, I would have 40,000–50,000 credits available. When I finally logged in last month to cancel, I was shocked to see that I only had 10,000 credits. I contacted customer service, and to their credit, they were very responsive. However, they explained that unused credits do not roll over. If you don’t use your 10,000 credits during that billing month, you simply lose them and your balance resets the following month. That was extremely disappointing. I had paid for several months of service without using it and had essentially received nothing for those payments. When I raised that concern, the solution offered was an additional 10,000 credits that I could use before my already-cancelled subscription ended. Since I didn’t currently have a need for the service, those extra credits provided essentially no value to me either. The frustrating part is that this could otherwise be a very useful product. The slide output I received was impressive. But combining a system where credits can be consumed quickly by relatively minor requests - such as asking a question or changing something as simple as a color - with a monthly “use it or lose it” policy makes the subscription very difficult to justify. Presentation needs aren’t necessarily consistent from month to month, and customers who pay for credits should either be able to retain them or have a much clearer and more flexible system for what they are purchasing. For me, the quality of the output was excellent, but the subscription and credit structure created such a poor user experience that I would have a hard time recommending the service.
Felipe Silva
Uso a ferramenta principalmente para slides e apostilas e ele tem se demostrado muito eficiente. Poucas vezes preciso apresentar interações adicionais para correções de erros no produto final. Quando necessário, aciono o suporte e sempre tenho um rápido e resolutivo atendimento. No geral, classifico para meu uso, 10/10.
Breynthe R Radin
I've been using Genspark to build small websites and simple apps for fun and to learn things like a personal portfolio page and a couple of test sites just to see what it could do. It's been great for quickly turning an idea into something that actually works without needing to code everything from scratch. What stood out to me is how fast it goes from a rough idea to a working site I didn't expect it to handle the design and layout that smoothly. It's also been a nice way to experiment and learn more about web development on the side. Would definitely recommend if you want to build something quick without a huge learning curve .
Typische Antwortzeit über einer Woche. Beantwortet 8 % der negativen Bewertungen.
Genspark erreicht aktuell 3,8 von 5 Sternen aus 323 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Gut“. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: US. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Genspark im Schnitt mit 3,8 von 5 Sternen („Gut“) auf Basis von 323 Bewertungen. 316 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Nein. Das Profil von Genspark ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Genspark hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Genspark: Antwortet langsam. Typische Antwortzeit über einer Woche.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.