Bewertung
4,4
Gut · von 5 Sternen
4,4von 5 · Gut
Bewertung
Gut · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
50 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Softwareunternehmen
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Josh
Jace is amazing. I tried shortwave, gemini, superhuman, along with writing my own script for claude. Nothing worked and they would hallucinate and give wrong information. A major issue I had with ALL of them except Jace is that they would ignore critical rules I had set (i.e. NEVER ASSUME anything when drafting a customer reply, ask me first). Jace is already saving me time and now that I set it up properly with the right rules it is working very very well. Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT all said Jace would have the same issues as shortwave but I assure you this is NOT the case. Much more reliable. My one complaint is the expense... you get around 10k credits for $25 and you can burn through those pretty quickly when drafting quotes for customers (500-1k credits for one email depending on complexity). Also setting it up and getting it tuned takes about 20k credits total. They give you 10k on the trial which was nice though and when I had a glitch on the backend with credits Jace support got with me later that same day and fixed it.
Pete Weinman
I have never sounded so professional. Jace remembers the history and relationships before drafting responses that sound just like I wrote them. I'm often impressed by its attention to detail and its ability to bring up details that I had, quite frankly, forgotten or overlooked. Additionally, it drafts friendly but professional-sounding follow-up reminders to important email threads that go unanswered, which helps keep me on track. Highly recommended.
Mevin K
The reviews trend tells you all you need to know: Was great, now NOT WORTH IT...total bait and switch. When I started it was $20/month and you could use it to help draft emails, auto draft replies ready for me to tweak and send, make recommendations on situations and responses, it read emails to gather aggregate information providing a very simple layout. It learned my style. I used it daily. Then they changed the pricing model to use credits (Feb/Mar26), and for the same $20 you get 10000 credits and I burned through them in 3 days (even being very mindful). A Simple question like "What was the link that allowed me to xxxx" can eat 600-800 credits. I tried 2 more months, but even using Jace less than 5% of what I did previously, I still run out of credits. They advised me to not use featured tools like auto-drafting or chat so as to preserve credits (not a lot of benefit left after that). These features burn far too many credits in the background without ANY interaction. I have to abstain 5 days at a time to preserve credits and still run out before 30 days. Even If I paid double for 20000 credits, Id have to use it at around 10% capacity and likely run out. Its a great tool to use. I have a lot of good things to say about how the solution works. But far overshadowed by the inability to use the main features...not worth it. You cant use it...
Steve Parr
They switched their billing system to a credit model out of nowhere and now it's unreasonably expensive. Will build this out elsewhere.
Yannick Véronneau
Jace is genuinely an excellent tool. The product itself works very well and has been valuable for my workflow, which makes this situation even more disappointing. I subscribed for a full year based on a pricing model built around a specific number of emails per month. Mid-subscription, that model was changed to a credit-based system. In practice, the new limits feel extremely low and will almost certainly cost me more than what I originally agreed to when I signed up. I raised my concerns with customer support, but the response was essentially that no changes would be made. My frustration is not with the quality of the tool... it is strong. It is with changing the commercial terms during an active annual subscription. That creates a real sense of distrust and disappointment. Great product, but this pricing change has seriously damaged my confidence.
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden. Beantwortet 30 % der negativen Bewertungen.
Laut Impressum
Jace AI erreicht aktuell 4,4 von 5 Sternen aus 70 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Gut“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (PMB 2, 0589 Wilmington, US) ist öffentlich dokumentiert, Kontaktdaten liegen offen. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Jace AI im Schnitt mit 4,4 von 5 Sternen („Gut“) auf Basis von 70 Bewertungen. 50 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Jace AI hat seinen Sitz in PMB 2, 0589 Wilmington, US. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Softwareunternehmen sind Freecash (4,8 von 5), Toluna (4,3 von 5), GoDaddy (4,3 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Jace AI ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Jace AI hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Jace AI: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.