Bewertung
1,4
Schlecht · von 5 Sternen
1,4von 5 · Schlecht
Bewertung
Schlecht · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
100 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Softwareanbieter
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Michael
I Got scammed i made a 3 day trail and they charged me for a whole year and no humans answer I want to get my money back. I am in contact with the bank and the police this is Fraud never buy from here they are scammers and never refunds and never helps Seaart.ai please contact me on the Gmail caspergronkjaer81@ gmail.com so I Can get my refund or Else it Will be forced
Phillip Bain
Keeps trying to bill me when I don't have any active subscription
pogo dekho
Complete brief review(except payment system as most of the complaints here are payment related): I've been an active SeaArt user for over 6 months, participating regularly across their various contest formats — daily/realism challenges, character events, model-specific events, and creative contests — often investing several hours a day into original work. Across several contests, I've seen winning entries that clearly don't meet the contest's own published requirements — minimal-effort submissions with no real content or engagement winning over clearly more developed, original work. This isn't a one-off; the same pattern shows up across multiple events, including the same handful of creators winning repeatedly while other entries appear to be chosen almost at random, with no visible judging behind the choice. The daily and realism challenges have their own version of this problem. These run on community voting, and challenges typically open in the early morning. Entries posted right at that opening window consistently end up with dozens of likes within minutes — far more than normal engagement would explain that early — while everyone else is left competing for whatever attention is left. It's hard to see this as organic. A Newcomer/Rising Star award category exists partly because users pushed back on fairness concerns about the same creators winning repeatedly. Since it was introduced, it's been applied inconsistently — present in some events, quietly absent in others, with no explanation either way. SeaArt's own official announcement page states that "official accounts will now provide expert commentary on winning entries, highlighting their strengths as a reference for the community" starting from events after May 9th, 2026. This has not happened for events since — another example of a public commitment that doesn't match what's actually delivered. Raising concerns through official channels hasn't led anywhere. The typical pattern: a surface-level show of appreciation or a brief, reassuring response for a day or two, then it's ignored entirely once attention fades. Users who keep raising it are often met with other community members downplaying the issue or suggesting they should just be grateful for free access — which has a chilling effect on anyone still willing to speak up. There's no real transparency into how judging works or who the judges are. The support staff is in heavy favoritism system, supporting, less restrictive to some and ignoring others. The discord support staff is worse like Pollo AI. Everytime getting scripted bot response is complete frustrating. The character chatbot appeal system has the same problem — heavy favoritism, with some users facing far fewer restrictions than others for similar content. Some creators' work gets pushed and promoted while others get heavily restricted until they give up, or their characters end up effectively hidden. The appeal process itself is broken and inconsistent — I've documented enough of this myself to be confident it's not a one-off. Meanwhile, the platform's visible effort each month goes into UI redesigns and making the site look polished, while these underlying issues don't get addressed — if anything, they keep piling up. It's worth noting that as I was writing this, itself has flagged this company's page with a "Breach of guidelines" warning for displaying content in a misleading way. That tracks with everything above — a gap between what's shown publicly and what's actually happening. SeaArt's tools are genuinely capable, and that's exactly why this matters. If you're going to run contests with real credit and subscription prizes and ask users to put in real creative hours, the judging and the platform's own public commitments need to actually hold up. Right now they don't — and it's a big part of why serious creators are quietly walking away.
Nathan Brown
The company trick you to oaying 1 month then take 1 year subscription. The email and customer service details return undelivered. Scam, avoid
Nikita Shcherbina
Fraudulent app. They offer a trial that expires in 3 days and then charge an annual payment without notice or concern. Never try to use it; it's not worth it at all.
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Seaart erreicht aktuell 1,4 von 5 Sternen aus 100 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Schlecht“. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: US. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Seaart im Schnitt mit 1,4 von 5 Sternen („Schlecht“) auf Basis von 100 Bewertungen. 100 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Softwareanbieter sind TotalAV (4,2 von 5), TeamViewer (4,8 von 5), Plugin Boutique (4,2 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Seaart ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Seaart hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Seaart: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.