Bewertung
1,3
Schlecht · von 5 Sternen
Softwareunternehmentrustpilot.ofpfunding.com
OFP Erfahrungen
1,3von 5 · Schlecht
Nicht beansprucht Beanspruchen Antwortet zügig
Stimmen
100
100 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Softwareunternehmen
3%
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Bewertungen (100)
100 in 12 MonatenIhre Stimme
Erfahrung zu OFP schreiben
Martin
Verifizierte Bewertung
9000$ Payout denied, “goodwill payout” reversed and not paid
9000$ Payout denied despite no rule breaking and consistency. Bad communication with the company plus lies left right and centre. Now received email that not even $50 goodwill payout will be made and are trying to give me a 2 phase challenge instead. Laughable company. Why would I waste my time again with this company, never again. Report to action fraud asap guys. They are the definition of a scam. Funny how even on the CEOs YouTube channel highlights strategies used by hedge funds as bad trading and gamblers just shows his lack of competency. Utter fraud and scam. Can’t even afford to pay out $50 3 months later.
0
Ganesh
Verifizierte Bewertung
Ofp is number 1 scammer in prop…
Ofp is number 1 scammer in prop industry!!! I have received mail in that ofp decline my payout (after they confirmed it)with their new clause’s and tell me that they will give me goodwill instead of payout! But still its 55+ days already passed and i didn’t even get a 50usd goodwill amount! Is ofp is this much poor company/ prop firm?
0
alastair
Verifizierte Bewertung
THE FIGURES SAY IT ALL
OFP still states, that they pay 'hundreds of traders each week' If that were the case, they would have loads of positive reviews each week. Scrolling down their Profile, the last positive review they had was on the 2nd August. But that and all the previous ones are about the cheap accounts, speed of set up etc. But the ones that do mention being paid, are fake, and few and far between. Even so the last 'fake review' was 2 months ago! Listen guys, this company never pays out, and never will. It's all a fake set up.
0
TAN CHING
Verifizierte Bewertung
Payout rejected under vague Clause 6.1…
Payout rejected under vague Clause 6.1 – one month later, still “pending review” I am very, very disappointed with my experience with OFP, particularly regarding their payout review process, transparency and customer support. On 21 July 2026, OFP rejected my payout request for Account 23868, citing Clause 6.1 and stating that my trading behavior did not comply with their risk management standards. They raised concerns about fluctuating lot sizes and warned against increasing lot sizes to target micro-profits. However, my position sizing was based on a structured risk management plan. I generally risked a maximum of approximately USD250 per trade, and my lot size varied because my stop-loss distance varied depending on market structure. The purpose of adjusting my lot size was to maintain controlled dollar risk, not to gamble or emotionally increase my risk. I trade only US30, normally a maximum of one trade per day, and over approximately three months I executed only around 10 trades. On 22 July 2026, I sent OFP a detailed appeal explaining my trading methodology, risk management rules and several actual trade examples. I specifically asked them to identify which trades or behaviors they considered non-compliant so that I could understand what was wrong and take the necessary steps to improve. This is particularly important because OFP's original rejection email itself stated that I could reply and their Risk Team would provide further clarification. After receiving no meaningful response, I followed up again on 29 July 2026. Since then, I have also repeatedly followed up through OFP Support from 29 July until today, 27 August 2026. The response is always essentially the same: “Pending review, please wait.” It has now been almost one month since my first follow-up, and more than a month since my original appeal, yet I still do not have a proper explanation of what exactly was wrong with my trading. How long should a trader reasonably be expected to wait just to understand why their payout was rejected? This lack of clarification puts me in a very difficult position. If I continue trading using my existing strategy without knowing what OFP considers wrong, I could spend another few months trading, generate another profit, request another payout and potentially have it rejected again for exactly the same reason. But if I stop trading while waiting for OFP to answer, I also have to worry about the 28-day inactivity rule and the possibility of my account being closed. So what am I supposed to do? Continue trading without knowing whether my strategy complies with their interpretation of Clause 6.1? Or stop trading while OFP takes weeks or months to review my appeal and risk my account becoming inactive? I can accept that a prop firm needs strict risk management rules. I can also accept a payout being rejected if there is a genuine and clearly explained breach. What I find extremely disappointing is having a payout rejected under a broad risk-management clause, asking specifically what I did wrong, providing a detailed explanation and supporting trade examples, and then waiting more than a month without receiving a substantive answer. Simply telling a customer repeatedly that the matter is “pending review, please wait” is not enough when the trader's payout and ability to continue trading are directly affected. In my view, this level of communication is not professional, especially for something as serious as rejecting a trader's payout. I am not asking OFP to guarantee that my strategy will make money or that every future payout will be approved. I am asking a very simple and reasonable question: What specifically did I do wrong under Clause 6.1, and what exactly do I need to change? After more than a month, I still do not have that answer. I am very, very disappointed with OFP and with how this matter has been handled. I am sharing my experience so that other traders are aware of the potential uncertainty surrounding Clause 6.1, payout reviews and the time taken to obtain clarification from OFP Risk Team. If OFP eventually provides a proper explanation and fairly resolves my appeal, I will update this review accordingly.
0
Iacoban Noris
Verifizierte Bewertung
if i could i would give them 0 stars
if i could i would give them 0 stars. they have a discord channel where everything is censured. people who got their payout request DENIED and complained about it are reduced to silence. ive been strugling to get to my target. worthless. go to other firms. definetly not this one. their PAYOUTS have hidden rules. they denied mine because of copytrading. thats some random bs cause i didtn copied anything. if anyone from OFP reads this im very disappointed in you. WORST CUSTOMER HELP EVER
0
Die Akte
Antwortet zügig
Typische Antwortzeit unter 7 Tagen. Beantwortet 89 % der negativen Bewertungen.
GB
Alternativen zu OFP
Softwareunternehmen-Ranking →Häufige Fragen zu OFP
Ist OFP seriös?
OFP erreicht aktuell 1,3 von 5 Sternen aus 100 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Schlecht“. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: GB. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Wie bewerten Kunden OFP?
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten OFP im Schnitt mit 1,3 von 5 Sternen („Schlecht“) auf Basis von 100 Bewertungen. 100 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Welche Alternativen zu OFP gibt es?
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Softwareunternehmen sind Freecash (4,6 von 5), Toluna (4,2 von 5), GoDaddy (4,4 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Ist das Profil von OFP beansprucht?
Nein. Das Profil von OFP ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann OFP hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Antwortet OFP auf Bewertungen?
OFP: Antwortet zügig. Typische Antwortzeit unter 7 Tagen.
Kann OFP negative Bewertungen löschen lassen?
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Wir löschen keine Bewertungen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.