Bewertung
3,6
Gut · von 5 Sternen
Softwareunternehmenvisualstudio.com
3,6von 5 · Gut
Bewertung
Gut · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
2 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Softwareunternehmen
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Mancini Digital
My experience with the Visual Studio Auto Agent has been disappointing. While it is marketed as a tool that can accelerate development and automate complex coding tasks, I have found that it frequently makes changes that were not requested, removes code that should remain untouched, and introduces issues that can take significant time to identify and fix. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of predictability. When using the Auto Agent, I often feel that I must carefully review every change because there is a real risk that existing functionality has been modified or broken. Instead of saving time, I sometimes spend hours debugging problems that did not exist before the agent made its changes. What makes this particularly frustrating is that usage is still charged regardless of the quality of the output. Whether the agent completes the task successfully or creates additional work, the cost to the user remains the same. As a result, the value proposition can feel questionable when the time spent correcting mistakes outweighs the time saved. AI coding agents are powerful tools, but they are not yet reliable enough to operate without close supervision on important projects. Until their accuracy and consistency improve, users should be cautious about trusting them with critical codebases. I believe AI-assisted development has tremendous potential, but current Auto Agent implementations need better safeguards, greater transparency, and stronger quality controls before they can be relied upon as true development partners.
Maximilian Baumgartner
Der beste Code Editor. Am Anfang sah alles kompliziert aus, aber auch für Anfänger ist er so einfach zu benutzen, die synchronisation hat noch nie Probleme gemacht, einfach alles ist perfekt.
PietPanzer Panzer
The worst de i have ever seen. The de marks code as faulty that is not faulty, the de breaks increadebly fast, requireing god level knowledge to make it work again. Sitting here for 40min waiting for the de to finally start compiling, no consol outputs are given. Maybe its useable when you got a lot of experiece, but to beginers the de is so infalted with random, bad features that it is like clearing a minefield by walking through it. The amout of coding to fixing the de is like 1:9. would not use at all, ifnot force to
Clive T
Microsoft is a company to both love and hate depending on which service you use. Microsoft visual studio, or VS code, as it is known, is one of those services that I really love. I'm probably not really doing justice when I call it an editor for writing code. It goes 100 miles beyond that. I think they call code editors IDEs. I haven't really compared VS code with any other IDE, except Jupyter, on which I started around nine months ago. I wish my teacher had not started me on Jupyter, but instead straight into the VS code that would've been much better. Having used VS Code for some six months I can say it is absolutely excellent. The programmers have left no stone unturned in terms of things you might want or need. All the annoying types of buggy things that you find in other programs, which you wish we're not there have been programmed out or modified so they don't annoy you in VSCode. Whoever built this has done an excellent job and thought of everything. It is really a finished and complete program that is more than I could've dreamed of. If only Microsoft could make their awful Cloud and Azure experience 10% as good as VS Code they would have me buying their shares.
LifelongLearner
Visual Studio Code is fast, easy to use, and very lightweight. It doesn't have some of the bells and whistles of heavyweight IDEs like Intellij Ultimate, but there are plugins for most things you can think of, and because it's not 4GB, it's a lot faster. The documentation is a bit thick and confusing and could really use a good, serious editing for completeness and ease of understanding. Get a good tech writer who can write plain English to rewrite it please. There are also a lot of holes in the documentation. But still, I use this editor 70% of the time.
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Für Microsoft Visual Studio liegen bisher 22 öffentliche Bewertungen vor (3,6 von 5) — für ein abschließendes Urteil ist die Datenlage noch dünn. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: US. Prüfen Sie zusätzlich Impressum und Vertragsbedingungen.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Softwareunternehmen sind Freecash (4,6 von 5), Toluna (4,2 von 5), GoDaddy (4,4 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Microsoft Visual Studio ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Microsoft Visual Studio hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Microsoft Visual Studio: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.