Bewertung
4,5
Hervorragend · von 5 Sternen
4,5von 5 · Hervorragend
Bewertung
Hervorragend · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
98 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Zahnarzt
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Laura elder
Do not use this company!!! I had a face to face meeting with this company and provided a recent x ray of my teeth wasn’t even 2 weeks old. They told me the treatment I would receive and the cost. After I booked my flights. Things weren’t adding up. I was asking questions but they didn’t get answered. They then completely changed my plan saying they didn’t have an x ray and it was only guess work when I had literally shown them a week before. They was rude on the phone. I’m just glad I didn’t give any money upfront.
James
I am writing this to provide a serious warning regarding the clinical standards and business practices of this clinic. My experience has resulted in a formal Section 75 claim and a UK dental report confirming gross negligence. It is highly significant that has stripped this clinic of its star rating due to the discovery of fake testimonials—my clinical reality is the evidence of what they are trying to hide. 1. Gross Clinical Negligence An independent assessment by a GDC-registered UK dentist (GDC 290828) has confirmed that I have Stage III Grade C Periodontitis with 30–50% bone loss. The clinic failed to diagnose or treat this systemic infection, choosing instead to place invasive veneers and implants on a diseased foundation. In the UK, performing cosmetic surgery on unstable, advanced gum disease is a fundamental breach of the duty of care. 2. Major Surgical Error (Retained Root) Radiographic evidence confirms the clinic left a retained tooth root in my jaw at the UL6 implant site. Placing a medical implant directly over a dead root fragment is an indefensible surgical failure and poses a severe long-term infection risk. 3. Defective Workmanship & Health Risks • Poorly Adapted Margins: The restorations have 'ledges' and 'gaps' that are plaque-retentive, actively worsening my gum disease. • Cement Overhangs: Excess surgical cement was left under the gum line, causing constant inflammation and bleeding. • Functional Failure: The bite (occlusion) is asymmetrical, causing tongue irritation and making basic interdental hygiene impossible. • Material Misrepresentation: Despite an agreement for a uniform OM3 shade, I was fitted with mismatched Zirconia and Emax materials. 4. Ethical Breach & Coercion When I raised these medical concerns, the Practice Manager became aggressive and hostile. I was told that any corrective work would be conditional on me signing a liability waiver to strip me of my legal rights. This is a predatory practice designed to silence patients who have been subjected to substandard care. Summary: This clinic prioritizes aesthetic "results" over patient health and safety. I am now undergoing urgent specialist intervention in the UK to save my natural teeth and remove the defective work. Do not trust the manufactured reviews; the clinical facts tell a different story.
robert veart
I chose VK Smile largely because of the reassurance given around UK aftercare support and the guarantee that any issues would be fully taken care of. Unfortunately, our experience after treatment has been disappointing. A crown required replacement due to a confirmed production fault. While VK Smile did remake the crown, communication throughout the aftercare process has involved repeated delays, inconsistent updates, and long periods without response. The main concern has been that despite the issue arising from a production fault, we have been advised that placement of the replacement crown at their UK partner clinic would be at our own cost. This does not reflect the aftercare expectations that were explained to us when we agreed to treatment. We have made every effort to resolve this directly and amicably over a prolonged period, however this matter is still awaiting resolution. I hope VK Smile will now review this properly and honour the aftercare commitments that were presented to us.
Paul Fox
Very happy with my teeth. Vk smile are great I would recommend them. Only reason not 5 stars is the lack of anyone who speaks fluent English and can explain the processes as they happen or before, rather than translating what the dentist is saying.. This didn't bother me that much but it would be nice to have everything explained in detail. The teeth feel great, I had fixed temps so was used to the feeling but the permanent ones are much better.
Justyna zaloga
Polecam serdecznie Zawsze odpowiadają na czas Wyjaśniają wszystko precyzyjnie i chcą żebyś był zadowolony Polecam serdecznie zwłaszcza dr Veysel Cecen
Typische Antwortzeit unter 7 Tagen. Beantwortet 20 % der negativen Bewertungen.
Pink Dental Clinic erreicht aktuell 4,5 von 5 Sternen aus 316 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Hervorragend“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Budapest, Kis Rókus u. 23, 1024 Macaristan, 1024 Budapest, HU) ist öffentlich dokumentiert, Kontaktdaten liegen offen. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Pink Dental Clinic im Schnitt mit 4,5 von 5 Sternen („Hervorragend“) auf Basis von 316 Bewertungen. 98 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Pink Dental Clinic hat seinen Sitz in Budapest, Kis Rókus u. 23, 1024 Macaristan, 1024 Budapest, HU. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Zahnarzt sind Godt Smil Tandlægerne (4,7 von 5), Centri Dentistici Primo (4,8 von 5), tandlægen.dk (4,8 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Pink Dental Clinic ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Pink Dental Clinic hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Pink Dental Clinic: Antwortet zügig. Typische Antwortzeit unter 7 Tagen.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.