Bewertung
2,0
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
ModMount Ltd Erfahrungen
2,0von 5 · Mangelhaft
Nicht beansprucht Beanspruchen Antwortet blitzschnell
Stimmen
311
81 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Finanzmakler
2%
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Bewertungen (311)
81 in 12 MonatenIhre Stimme
Erfahrung zu ModMount Ltd schreiben
Marco Melo
Verifizierte Bewertung
The Modmount platform claims that the…
The Modmount platform claims that the losses stem from natural fluctuations in the financial market. This argument does not hold up against the documentary evidence. The losses did not result from inherent market risk, but from two artificial and fraudulent mechanisms operated by the platform itself, demonstrable by simple visual review of the documents, without the need for any specialized technical knowledge: a) Outdated chart by USD 0.53 — artificially unfavorable entry price: In a simultaneous comparison carried out on June 25, 2024, at 8:48 PM, the independent brokers IXXEN and XTB (xStation 5 platform) displayed an identical quote of USD 2,319.91 for the asset Gold (XAU/USD), consistent with the international market. The Modmount platform, in isolation, presented an artificially lowered value of USD 2,319.38 and an abusive spread of 268 points. It is impossible for only one platform to present a price different from the global market for an internationally standardized asset. The price convergence between two independent brokers confirms that the correct value was USD 2,319.91 — and that Modmount was fraudulently manipulating its charts. The practical effect is that every position opened by the broker was already a losing one, as the entry price was artificially unfavorable from the very first moment. The proof is objective, public, and replicable, requiring only a visual verification of the attached printout. Once again, I request extrajudicially the return of USD 893.00 that were taken from me.
0
Marco Melo
Verifizierte Bewertung
the refund of USD 893.00
The proposal presented is unacceptable and contrary to the fundamental principles of consumer law. The restitution of amounts charged improperly constitutes an autonomous and inalienable legal obligation, and cannot be conditioned — directly or indirectly — on the removal of complaints, reviews, reports, or any public records related to the events that occurred. Reimbursement is not a mere act of generosity, but a legal duty, and its very nature prevents it from being used as a bargaining chip to restrict or suppress legitimate consumer expressions. The message sent by the company clearly shows that the refund of USD 893.00 is not being offered independently, but expressly tied to the requirement to remove 147 links. Such conduct constitutes an explicit attempt to condition financial compensation on the elimination of unfavorable public records, a practice incompatible with objective good faith and the duty of transparency that suppliers have. There is no legal basis for requiring consumers to waive their right to report facts, file complaints, or maintain publications based on their legitimate experience in exchange for receiving amounts that the company itself acknowledges are owed. Freedom of expression and the right to information in the consumer market are constitutional guarantees, not negotiable. If the company acknowledges the return of USD 893.00, the payment must be made immediately, in full, and unconditionally. Any questions regarding reviews, complaints, or publications constitute an autonomous matter unrelated to the obligation to reimburse, and cannot be used as a bargaining tool. I also note that the proposal received will be documented and may be presented to the competent authorities, consumer protection agencies, and review platforms as evidence that the company chooses to link refunds to the removal of critical content, to the detriment of objectively addressing the reported facts—conduct that may give rise to administrative, civil, and criminal liability. I expect, within 48 (forty-eight) hours, confirmation of the full and unconditional refund, under penalty of taking appropriate legal and extrajudicial measures. Sincerely,
0
Marco Melo
Verifizierte Bewertung
I am trying to recover US$893.00 (eight…
I am trying to recover US$893.00 (eight hundred and ninety-three US dollars) since July 2024, an amount I believe was improperly debited from my account due to the use of a trading chart with an approximate 50-cent delay and the charging of a swap fee approximately 11.28 times higher than that charged by other brokers outside the group formed by Modmount, FXNovus, and Fintana. After several attempts to resolve the situation directly with Modmount, I stopped receiving responses from the company. I also filed a formal complaint with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of Seychelles, but I did not receive any effective help in recovering the lost funds. Although they present themselves as independent CFD (Contracts for Difference) brokers, registered in different offshore jurisdictions, Modmount and Fintana have very similar operational characteristics and are frequently mentioned together by investors who report similar problems. Both operate outside the Brazilian financial system and are not authorized by the Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) to offer investments or solicit clients in Brazil. Furthermore, there are numerous public reports from investors mentioning difficulties in making withdrawals, excessive charges, pressure to make new deposits, and a lack of adequate support after transferring funds. Modmount operates under a license issued in the Seychelles, while Fintana reports being regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius, under license GB23201338. In practice, my experience has shown that these regulatory structures do not offer effective protection to foreign investors seeking to recover funds or resolve financial disputes. The Seychelles and Mauritius are widely used by companies operating in the international CFD market due to the regulatory ease offered by these jurisdictions. These regulatory bodies do not maintain compensation funds for harmed investors, nor do they usually intervene to determine the return of funds to clients residing in other countries. I also observed that several investors report a similar pattern of commercial approach: promises of profitability, constant encouragement to make new investments, and difficulties when the client tries to withdraw their funds. My goal with this complaint is to warn other consumers and seek the recovery of the US$893.00 that I believe was improperly withdrawn from my account. After almost two years of attempts at resolution, I have yet to receive a satisfactory response from either the company or the regulatory bodies to which I have appealed. For this reason, I consider it important to make my experience public so that other investors carefully research before transferring funds to platforms that operate through these offshore structures.
0
Jonathan Pierce
Verifizierte Bewertung
Before opening my account,I took some…
Before opening my account,I took some time to read through the conditions and requirments. The information was presented clearly.
0
Adam Fletcher
Verifizierte Bewertung
I felt reasonably comfortable using…
I felt reasonably comfortable using ModMount because the registration process included identity verification and the company’s regulatory information was available. While the experience felt fairly secure, there is still room for improvement in terms of trust and transparency.
0
Die Akte
Antwortet blitzschnell
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden. Beantwortet 84 % der negativen Bewertungen.
Alternativen zu ModMount Ltd
Finanzmakler-Ranking →Häufige Fragen zu ModMount Ltd
Ist ModMount Ltd seriös?
ModMount Ltd erreicht aktuell 2,0 von 5 Sternen aus 311 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Room B11, First Floor, Providence Complex, Providence, 673310 Mahe, SC) ist öffentlich dokumentiert, Kontaktdaten liegen offen. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Wie bewerten Kunden ModMount Ltd?
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten ModMount Ltd im Schnitt mit 2,0 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 311 Bewertungen. 81 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Wo hat ModMount Ltd seinen Sitz?
ModMount Ltd hat seinen Sitz in Room B11, First Floor, Providence Complex, Providence, 673310 Mahe, SC. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Welche Alternativen zu ModMount Ltd gibt es?
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Finanzmakler sind Deriv (3,7 von 5), Icmarkets (4,6 von 5), Trade Republic (4,7 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Ist das Profil von ModMount Ltd beansprucht?
Nein. Das Profil von ModMount Ltd ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann ModMount Ltd hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Antwortet ModMount Ltd auf Bewertungen?
ModMount Ltd: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Kann ModMount Ltd negative Bewertungen löschen lassen?
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Wir löschen keine Bewertungen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.