Bewertung
4,5
Hervorragend · von 5 Sternen
Computersicherheitsdienstsiteguarding.com
Siteguarding Erfahrungen
4,5von 5 · Hervorragend
Nicht beansprucht Beanspruchen Antwortet blitzschnell
Stimmen
100
11 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Computersicherheitsdienst
84%
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Bewertungen (100)
11 in 12 MonatenIhre Stimme
Erfahrung zu Siteguarding schreiben
CSK Management
Verifizierte Bewertung
Outstanding Customer Experience
For years, I haven't experienced such level of responsiveness, competence, and friendly support. Simply awesome.
0
Bolog
Verifizierte Bewertung
We have been with them since 2018 and…
We have been with them since 2018 and unfortunately, it is not the same as before. Having problems with website which maybe a compatibility issue with PHP, so I got in contact with them. We have paid for Premium Hosting that includes website security but have been told by customer services we only paid for security. They can't even get that straight. Don't get me wrong, they were great back between 2018-2022, but after that started to go backwards. Looking to switch all my websites that are hosted with them to a different company. May have gotten too big, not sure or not sure what happened to them. It is unfortunate.
0
James W
Verifizierte Bewertung
My visitors go to bad site from…
My visitors go to bad site from redirect, and complained. This service stopped it and keep page safe. Now all stay on my shop. I like how it was fixed. Very good!
0
Karl
Verifizierte Bewertung
My hosting provider recommended…
My hosting provider recommended siteguard and i decided to try it. Setup was not complicated and scans started right away. When I had questions, support was helpful and didn't use too much technical language. All good now. It gives me more confidence about my site security.
0
Amrit Mirpuri
Verifizierte Bewertung
We purchased a 6-site hosting +…
We purchased a 6-site hosting + security package (paid €1,832.15) based on written assurances that (1) they would transfer our sites and update DNS for us, and (2) there would be “no downtime.” In practice, the experience was the opposite: repeated outages, access blocks, inconsistent guidance, and frequent blame-shifting. Highlights of what we experienced: Repeated downtime and errors across critical pages (including landing pages that generate leads). We saw “Resource Limit Is Reached,” 403 Forbidden, Cloudflare 521, and even “410 Gone.” Cloudflare/DNS handling was chaotic. We were told Cloudflare wasn’t their responsibility, then later they instructed/required Cloudflare, changed DNS routing, and even requested account credentials at one point. Later, they admitted Cloudflare routing was initiated by them. Billing/account records were inconsistent: support repeatedly claimed “no payment recorded” or “no active license,” despite our payment confirmation and the service being in place. Admin/support workflows were inefficient: we were repeatedly told to submit the same “access details” form again and again, and even encountered errors submitting it. Support quality was inconsistent. Some agents tried to help, but others were dismissive, and the overall process lacked ownership and clear root-cause reporting. We eventually got an invoice and the sites were migrated, but the ongoing performance and reliability issues (and the inconsistent support narrative) made this a very poor experience for a business relying on stable sites. Currently, our sites are encountering issues with the package allocated by SIteguarding, we paid premium, we were suppose to be allocated 50 gb per site, upon chatting with the support, they only allocated 1 gb, our site was offline for 1 week, they didnt accept liability but instead tried to keep selling us the premium package until today when we are already under premium since November. Lastly, our cpanel credentials are changed daily for some reason by their system, we cant even access the sites. They are blaming us that we keep changing but we didnt. They blame their poor performance of bug checking to the client, instead of finding the root cause.
0
Die Akte
ComputersicherheitsdienstSoftwareunternehmenSicherheitsdienstWeb-Hosting-UnternehmenSoftwareanbieter
Antwortet blitzschnell
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden. Beantwortet 40 % der negativen Bewertungen.
GB
Alternativen zu Siteguarding
Computersicherheitsdienst-Ranking →Häufige Fragen zu Siteguarding
Ist Siteguarding seriös?
Siteguarding erreicht aktuell 4,5 von 5 Sternen aus 100 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Hervorragend“. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: GB, Kontaktdaten liegen offen. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Wie bewerten Kunden Siteguarding?
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Siteguarding im Schnitt mit 4,5 von 5 Sternen („Hervorragend“) auf Basis von 100 Bewertungen. 11 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Welche Alternativen zu Siteguarding gibt es?
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Computersicherheitsdienst sind TeamViewer (4,8 von 5), Shop Winandoffice (4,9 von 5), Network Solutions (4,2 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Ist das Profil von Siteguarding beansprucht?
Nein. Das Profil von Siteguarding ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Siteguarding hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Antwortet Siteguarding auf Bewertungen?
Siteguarding: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Kann Siteguarding negative Bewertungen löschen lassen?
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Wir löschen keine Bewertungen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.