Bewertung
1,8
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
1,8von 5 · Mangelhaft
Bewertung
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
82 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Hotel
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
ANDREW WILLIAMS
Disgusting company. As a previous review said. Anyone can say any lies and rubbish and TripAdvisor allow it. Even when it's obviously a fabrication. They allow people to create false/multiple profiles to bully, intimidate and try to ruin a business.
Tarlochan Lohiya
Unfortunately, I had a very disappointing experience at the St Austell Premier Inn. I have been staying at Premier Inn for around 15 years, and this is the first time I have ever had such a bad experience. The room was extremely dusty and had spider webs. There was no shower gel and no toilet tissue provided. Most concerningly, my daughter developed a skin rash on her face during our stay, which made the poor cleanliness even more worrying for us. I expected much better standards from Premier Inn, especially after being a loyal customer for so many years. I hope management takes this feedback seriously and looks into what happened, as this experience was very upsetting for my family.
DAVID SMITH
Regent is no longer a luxury cruise . Since the acquisition by Norwegian Cruise Line the cost cutters and bean counters have been busy. You will find better value for money from the budget cruise lines at a fraction of this price. Its always the same once a top class cruise company like Regent are acquired the cost cutters set to work to improve there margins at your cost. This was a very expensive cruise nearly $2,500 per night for 10 nights. F1 Serenity. I discussed this with the ships manager Michael Coghlan who was very sympathetic to my criticisms but in the end what you see is what you get and be in no doubt it is simply not good enough at this price point. Unfortunately we have two further cruises booked with Regent and having paid our deposits are now locked in otherwise we would definitely cancel. We thought we were booking the Regent Cruise pre the acquisition but discovered we paid the premium for a budget cruise line. The food offerings are an embarrassment at this price point. 1/ Prime 7, very good 8/10 2/ Pacific Rim, good 7/10 3/ Chartreuse , Average 6/10 4/ La Veranda, Breakfast ,poor 5/10 5/ La Veranda Lunch buffet, very poor 4/10 6/ Compass Rose ,Average 5/10 7/ Pool Grill, Absolutely appalling rubbish, you eat better at Mc Donalds 2/10 and thats being generous. Coffee Connection ,Average 5/10 8/ Sette Mari ,Average 6/10 Small restaurant. To sum up avoid the hype and spin and spend your hard earned money elsewhere. AVOID.
Ross
Trip Advisor are an awful company. Reviews of the wrong company allowed. Incorrect and untruthful reviews allowed. Arbitrarily delete valid and genuine reviews. Whether good or bad. No customer support PEOPLE only too stupid to mention AI which isn’t intelligent. Trip advisor should be ignored. Alternate review only websites which aren’t commercially gaining from reviews should instead be used. Google Maps reviews are far more accurate. In response to TA response. I've lost count of the number of times I've seen reviews of companies which are erroneous and clearly of the wrong business on a TA profile. IT really does diminish the value of the review system. You DO profit from reviews as you sell advertising to companies which list their reviews on your website, to say you do not is disingenuous and frankly lends more credibility to TA being an evil organisation.
Sa Wi
It's not until you have reason to complain to a company that you find out how poor their customer service is. The sheer arrogance of TripAdvisor knows no bounds and I have absolutely no faith that they vet reviews for accuracy and the fake reviews are causing genuine businesses to suffer. I know that my comments will get their stock response of 'To ensure our content is helpful and accurate, we use both automated technology and a moderation team to verify that reviews are family-friendly, correctly placed, and compliant with our submission guidelines. If a review is flagged as suspicious or violates our policies, our team investigates and removes any content that does not meet our standards' because their employees obviously don't have the intelligence to provide a personal response and actually address complainants concerns. It's good job we have Google to look at as their reviews seem more accurate.
Typische Antwortzeit über einer Woche. Beantwortet 37 % der negativen Bewertungen.
TripAdvisor erreicht aktuell 1,8 von 5 Sternen aus 3.636 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: GB. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten TripAdvisor im Schnitt mit 1,8 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 3.636 Bewertungen. 82 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Hotel sind eDreams (4,2 von 5), Opodo (4,2 von 5), lastminute.com (4,0 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von TripAdvisor ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann TripAdvisor hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
TripAdvisor: Antwortet langsam. Typische Antwortzeit über einer Woche.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.