Bewertung
1,9
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
1,9von 5 · Mangelhaft
Bewertung
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
69 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Reisebüro
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Nicky A
Dear Jose Schroder Garcia and Lucas Centelles Fabre, Directors of Visit-App I believed I was applying for an official Australian Government eVisitor visa, which is free for UK passport holders when applied for directly through the Australian Government website. Instead, I was unknowingly directed to a private intermediary website and charged $110 USD per application for four applications, despite the underlying visa itself being free. In my opinion, the website design, sponsored Google advertisement and application process were misleading and did not make the nature of the service sufficiently clear. Your company wrote to me: “After carefully reviewing your request, we would like to reiterate that the maximum refund we are able to offer for the submitted applications is $70 USD.” I accepted this written offer, yet no refund has ever been processed. I have since attempted to contact your company through every customer service channel provided, including australia [at] visit-app.org, Canada [at] visit-app.org, fmm [at] visit-app.org and info [at] visitapp-travel.com. My follow-up emails have simply been ignored. In your public response you stated that customers should continue the conversation through your customer support channels. My question is simple: which channel, when none of the published email addresses receive a response? Reference numbers: 176833121595 176833151413 176833220602 176833257894 I have retained copies of the refund offer, my acceptance, unanswered emails and evidence that Google removed sponsored advertisements after determining they breached Google’s advertising policies. I continue to encourage affected UK and EU consumers to report their experience to the European Consumer Centre (ECC) network.
Miryam
I used this website believing it was an official Korean visa application service. After making the payment, I received a reference number, but it does not appear or work on the official Korean K-ETA system When I contacted the company, they were unable to provide any official proof that my application was submitted to the Korean authorities. They also refused to issue a refund. Based on my experience, this website is not an official government platform and can be misleading for users who are trying to apply for a Korean visa or K-ETA. I strongly recommend that travelers only use the official website
N Arnold
This is a follow-up to my original review. Dear Jose Schroder Garcia and Lucas Centelles Fabre, Directors of Visit-App After my initial complaint, I received the following written response from australia [at] visit-app.org “After carefully reviewing your request, we would like to reiterate that the maximum refund we are able to offer for the submitted applications is $70 USD. This remains our final offer under the terms and conditions accepted at the time of purchase.” However, despite this written refund offer, no refund has been processed. Since then, I have attempted further contact through the customer service channels and email addresses provided, including: * * australia [at] visit-app.org * canada [at] visit-app.org * fmm [at] visit-app.org * info [at] visitapp-travel.com No meaningful response has been received and communication now appears to be ignored entirely. In your reply you stated: “We genuinely encourage you to continue this conversation through our customer support channel so that we can investigate the details of your case and work towards a resolution.” Which customer support channel are customers actually supposed to use when emails are not being answered? Reference/order numbers: 176833121595 176833151413 176833220602 176833257894 I have retained screenshots of the sponsored Google result, the application flow, the refund correspondence and the unanswered follow-up emails sent to the addresses above. I would still encourage affected customers within the EU/UK to report their experience to the European Consumer Centre (ECC) network.
Alvaro Villatoro
If I could give zero stars I would, this is a scam they will steal your information and charge you 120 usd for something you can do for 7 usd, they mimic the oficial webpage of embassy’s around the world, beware
Katiu
It is clearly a scam!!!!! The website looks like an official Canadian government page, with no transparent information about fees!!!!! I was misled into paying for a service that should be simple and low-cost!!!!! When I tried to cancel, they refused—even though the eTA they claim to have processed is not valid or even recognized on the official Canadian government system!!!!! I feel deceived and extremely frustrated!!!!! This is unfair, deeply misleading, and should be investigated so others don’t go through the same situation!!!!!
Visit-App erreicht aktuell 1,9 von 5 Sternen aus 117 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: Unternehmenssitz: ES. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Visit-App im Schnitt mit 1,9 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 117 Bewertungen. 69 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Reisebüro sind Viator.com (4,5 von 5), JustFly (4,1 von 5), TUI (4,6 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Visit-App ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Visit-App hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Visit-App antwortet hier nicht auf Bewertungen. Ohne beanspruchtes Profil kann die Firma hier nicht antworten.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.