Bewertung
4,6
Hervorragend · von 5 Sternen
4,6von 5 · Hervorragend
Bewertung
Hervorragend · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
15 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Kinderwunschklinik
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Devastated former patient
I am extremely concerned by my recent experience with Vitanova Fertility Clinic and would strongly advise anyone considering storing reproductive material there to obtain its policies regarding transfer and destruction clearly and explicitly in writing before sending anything. I fully understood that Vitanova could not continue fertility treatment for me in Denmark after I reached age 46, which I did a few months ago. That was never in dispute. What I did not understand was that donor sperm I purchased in the United States, paid to have transported to Denmark, and paid Vitanova to store could become impossible to transfer elsewhere and ultimately be destroyed - with or without my consent - once I reached that age. Those are two very different situations. It is possible that some reference to this exists in the clinic's terms or paperwork, and I may have missed it. My concern is that a consequence this serious should never be something an international patient can reasonably miss or misunderstand. If reaching a particular age means that irreplaceable reproductive material may no longer be transferred out of the clinic and may instead have to be destroyed, that needs to be made exceptionally clear before the material is accepted for storage. In my case, the opposite impression was reinforced during my consultation. Vitanova's age limit was specifically discussed, and I was told that if necessary I could “move to another facility outside Denmark” that was willing to treat me after age 46. I therefore had no reason to understand that the donor sperm being stored for my treatment could later become impossible to move with me. Had I clearly understood that reaching age 46 could result in the permanent destruction of my stored donor sperm, with no option to transfer it to another appropriately licensed clinic, I would never have agreed to store it at Vitanova. This is particularly significant because this is the same donor I used to conceive my son. The remaining sperm is therefore not something I can simply replace by purchasing another donor sample. During a recent telephone conversation, a Vitanova staff member told me that she could understand how this type of misunderstanding happens and indicated that similar situations have happened to other patients, including, she said, cases that resulted in legal action. To me, that makes the need for clearer disclosure even more obvious. If multiple patients have misunderstood such a consequential policy, the solution should be to make the policy unmistakably clear. During this same call, where I calmly explained my concerns and devastation, this staff member attributed the situation to “tricky legislation” and stated they cannot do anything “illegal.” She ended the conversation by hanging up on me. Whatever the ultimate legal interpretation may be, my central concern is transparency. A fertility clinic accepting reproductive material from international patients should clearly explain, before storage begins, any circumstance in which that material may later become non-transferable or subject to mandatory destruction. This is especially true when the consequences are permanent, financially significant, but most of all emotionally devastating.
Guro
Jeg følte meg trygg fra første stund hos Vitanova!
Roberta Sparapani
Abbiamo fatto la fivet sia io che mia moglie e tutto lo staff è sempre stato molto carino e disponibile. Rispondono velocemente alle email. Sono stati disponibilissimi in tutto il nostro percorso sia in esito positivo che in esito negativo
Marie
Je recommande mille fois Vitanova pour son expertise scientifique, médicale, mais également sa réactivité, son accompagnement, et l'humanité de son équipe. Dans les parcours de PMA, ce n'est pas anodin ! C'est même essentiel. L'approche est humaine tout en étant efficace. On ose poser ses questions. On nous répond toujours. ... et c'est ainsi que je tiens mon bébé dans les bras depuis quelques jours maintenant ! Elle est magnifique ! Et c'est un petit miracle auquel Vitanova a contribué++ . Merci !!
Anonym
Kan kun rose personalet. Virkelig kompetente læger. Sødt og imødekommende personale lige fra læger til sygeplejersker til sekretærene mm. Virkelig fine og behagelige omgivelser. Klinikken ligger meget centralt/er let at komme til. Havde næsten givet op til sidst, men sidder nu med min lille baby kun få uger gamle i mine arme og er virkelig lykkelig. Tak er kun et fattigt ord. Vitanova make dreams come true❤️ så af hjertet endnu en gang ubeskrivelig mange tak for hjælpen til at jeg sidder med mit lille mirakel i dag og tak for jeres omsorg og støtte og altid gode humør.
Typische Antwortzeit unter 7 Tagen. Beantwortet 67 % der negativen Bewertungen.
Vitanova erreicht aktuell 4,6 von 5 Sternen aus 205 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Hervorragend“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Vester Voldgade 106, 3., DK-1552 Copenhagen, DK) ist öffentlich dokumentiert, Kontaktdaten liegen offen. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Vitanova im Schnitt mit 4,6 von 5 Sternen („Hervorragend“) auf Basis von 205 Bewertungen. 15 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Vitanova hat seinen Sitz in Vester Voldgade 106, 3., DK-1552 Copenhagen, DK. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Kinderwunschklinik sind Hertility (4,1 von 5), Fertypharm (3,9 von 5), Zita West Products (4,5 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Vitanova ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Vitanova hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Vitanova: Antwortet zügig. Typische Antwortzeit unter 7 Tagen.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.